skip to main content

You Are Here: Home / Learning / Money and Management / Management & Organisations / Evan on...Company rules
 
Management & organisations
 

Evan on...Company rules

 
Do not enter sign
Do not enter sign

All in the mind

The same thinking processes that help you cope with everyday life prejudice your judgements in other areas. Consider the psychology of decision making.

Keeping ahead

In business, the race is always to the swift - but how can companies maximise their competitive advantage?

Do we need rules in the work place? The Bottom Line's Evan Davis ponders over a workplace without rules

Watch

You need the Flash Player (version 7 or higher) to view this clip - download Flash.

Listen

Save this mp3 file to your computer

Save this mp3 file to your computer

You need the Flash Player (version 7 or higher) to use our mp3 player - download Flash.

Save this mp3 file to your computer

Read

What do we prefer; companies that are disciplined, stick by the rules, or companies that have free spirits, making it up as they go along? Well, I think if you talk to the average worker or the average boss they’d probably say, “oh, we like the free spirited company”, “we like to give our workers responsibility for themselves to make their own decisions”, “we don’t like to stick by the rules”, “we like to encourage innovation and creativity” and all those things that modern companies like to encourage. Well, I want to give a little bit of a defence of rules. Start by just thinking of a company where there are no rules.

What does that mean? It means discretion. Discretion is the opposite of rules. It means the staff having to make decisions for themselves about how to behave, about how far they can go in one direction before they’re behaving in some sense badly. It means people making decisions for themselves. Now that can be truly liberating, but it can also be a tyranny. It can also mean you spend a lot of time thinking about things that other people have already thought about, trying to decide whether you can go in this direction when actually the company already knows whether you should go in that direction. It has an institutional memory, people have done it, it didn’t work and they don’t want you to do it. The rule itself can often be extremely liberating for workers and, of course, for bosses.

So I tend to believe that the rules have a purpose and the rules don’t necessarily stifle creativity. It’s about allowing within the rules enough room for space or enough space for people to innovate, develop and be creative. You don’t want your rules to be ridiculous rules or oppressive rules but rules all over the place and an understanding that there’s an expectation that you’ll stick to those rules. Rules are not meant for breaking, contrary to the popular phrase. I think, in that way you’ll often get a better company, a better organised company and a more productive company than one where people have to invent every decision for themselves from scratch. So let’s hear it for rules.

That’s my view. You can join the debate with the Open University.

Join the debate with the Open University

Also this week

Content last updated: 01/10/2009

 

Bookmark with:

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit
  • Stumbleupon
Please wait while loading. You must have JavaScript enabled to view star ratings.
 

Comments

Please wait while loading. You must have JavaScript enabled to view comments.
 
 

Explore Open2

Penguin

Two members of the Life team go in search of penguins in their natural environment. See what they find on Deception Island.

Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe

Would you say you're a Christian? Share your views, and learn about the views of others, in our new Christianity survey.

Breaking news, 1940s style

Keep up to date with our Twitterfeeds of latest news from Open2 and alerts of OU programmes on the BBC.

 
 

Site info and help