Programme 5: Fit To Practise
Other Medicine transcript
How can you tell the healers from the charlatans? Who is fit to practise?
Listen to this programme
To use listen again, you'll need have a free piece of software called RealPlayer on your computer. If the link doesn't work, visit audio help from the BBC.
Programme-by-programme
Programme 1. Why is CAM so popular?
Programme 2. How do we know if they work?
Programme 3. Does it matter how it works?
Programme 4. First, do no harm
Programme 5. Fit to practise
Programme 6. A marriage made in heaven?
A marriage made in heaven
Sometimes called "the Prince Charles approach", there's a move to try and integrate CAM and orthodox medical practices for the benefit of all - but like many unions, there is unease on both sides. Can we really say that CAM and mainstream medical practice is a marriage made in heaven?
Related programme
Anna Ford asks what standards ensure therapists are fit for the task, in the fifth programme in the BBC/OU series The Other Medicine
Can anyone call themselves a homeopath or an osteopath? (Osteopathy was the first CAM to be properly regulated, and only those practitioners who have attained a prescribed level of training can call themselves osteopaths). What about crystal therapists? Doctors can go on day courses and call themselves acupuncturists, whereas traditional practitioners of Chinese medicine see their training as a lifelong project.
How does regulation in the CAM world compare with the “conventional” medical world? How have internal political power struggles within CAM slowed progress in this area? The House of Lords Select Committee report recommends that each therapy should have a single regulatory authority with clear guidelines on competency and training – how likely is that, and what are the hurdles? At the moment, most practitioners are free to practise as they like after they are qualified – should CAM therapists be subject to the same sort of five-yearly revalidation that doctors now have to undergo?
We speak to students of CAM at various stages of their training – comparing, say, the four year or longer training in osteopathy with a two day course in aromatherapy massage. Given that many therapies incorporate a considerable element of diagnosis, some have argued that therapists should do more basic medical science training (in anatomy, physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology). Is this another example of medical colonialism?
This website is provided for general information only, and should not be treated as a substitute for the medical advice of your own doctor or any other health care professional. The BBC and the Open University are not responsible or liable for any diagnosis made by a user based on the content of the Open2.net website. The BBC and the Open University are not liable for the contents of any external internet sites listed, nor do they endorse any commercial product or service mentioned or advised on any of the sites. Always consult your own GP if you're in any way concerned about your health.
Content last updated: 08/09/2004
